Home Blog Page 790

Get ready to do the T.O. garbage bag toss

0

Allan Lamport, mayor of Toronto in the 1950s, put it well: “It’s hard making predictions, especially about the future.”

Will our civic leaders lock out unionized city staff in early February, or will they reach an agreement with them without taking that drastic step? Labour negotiations are so tricky it’s best not to be too firm in predicting how they might turn out.

With that caveat out of the way, I think the staffing future at City Hall looks troublesome.

Deputy mayor Doug Holyday is the mayor’s spokesperson on labour issues. He’s made many statements outlining that the difference with unionized city workers has more to do with work arrangements than it does with money. Thus, when Mark Ferguson, the head of the Canadian Union of Public Employees Union 416 representing the city’s outside workers, said the local would be willing to forgo any increase in wages during the next three years, Holyday belittled the offer. Indeed, when the city and union negotiators got together two days later, the city apparently was prepared to offer a one-time payment to each employee.

For Holyday, and Mayor Ford’s other allies, the differences with the union aren’t about money. Holyday says the city wants to strip job security from the union contract. One aspect of that is seniority, which means that, when the city lays workers off, those laid off first are the ones who have been employed for the shortest period of time while those with more seniority and experience remain employed, some by being bumped down to a lower-level job. This is a common feature of labour contracts across the country and protects individual employees from being selectively picked off during a layoff (or under the guise of one) because they are unliked by management.

“The decision on labour matters rests with a Ford-controlled committee, not with city council.”

This seniority provision doesn’t prevent the city from downsizing, and doesn’t give anyone a job for life. But it does protect individual employees from bad managers, of which the city has its fair share.

He says the city wants to end the practice of allowing employees who have had to work without a break through lunch or dinner to go home early — but he hasn’t suggested a better way of responding to staff doing physical work (members of Local 416 collect garbage, clean streets and parks and the like) who are denied a chance to rest and eat.

He says the city wants to end the need to get the union’s consent before it changes shift schedules. No instances are given of the union unreasonably refusing changes in shift schedules, and surely good management practice should be to consult about working arrangements before changes are made. Apparently this is another example of employee power that Ford, Holyday and their colleagues think should end.

The problem with the approach that Holyday et al. are taking is that it is not about good management practices, creating more efficiencies, providing a better work experience or saving money.  It’s about ideology. Too many stupid battles have been fought in the name of ideology, and it’s sad to think this kind of crazy scenario could be coming to Toronto.

Some say that the defeat the Ford faction experienced on the city budget — many of the cuts Ford had proposed were unexpectedly rejected by a slim majority of city council in mid-January — shows that city council would never countenance a lockout of staff and the stoppage to city services.

However, the decision on labour matters rests with a Ford-controlled committee, not with city council.

Where’s the sense of community in all of this? Isn’t that what we should expect? Things look like they could go very badly for the city in the next few weeks. Of course, you could be optimistic.

“We are on an irreversible course,” Mayor Lamport said, “but this could change.”

Grab of the Week: a leather heart-shaped zip pouch

0

When hearts begin to appear all around in the run-up to Valentine’s Day, you can find them in almost any form: usually paper, chocolate, hard candy or plastic. But it’s not often that you come across individual hearts made from leather. It was love at first sight when our eyes met these leather heart-shaped zip pouches from Roots.

This year, we say forego giving cards to your sweethearts in favour of these. There are three colour options, so remember: white for a friend, pink for your crush and red for your love.

$18. Available at Roots, 220 Yonge Street, 416-593-9640

Leaside murder case stuns neighbourhood

0

A recent murder in the quiet Leaside community has shocked residents. Police reportedly responded to a call for a missing person on Airdrie Drive, near Eglinton Avenue and Laird Drive on New Year’s Day. Through the course of their investigation, police found a deceased person.

A 46-year-old male, later identified as Paul Hindle, was charged with second degree murder in connection with the case.

Police subsequently identified the victim as 45-year-old Lisa Lebitka. A news release indicated that the cause of death had not yet been established.

It’s something that has stunned the community, according to Coun. John Parker — that this could happen in Leaside and, in particular, to someone like Lebitka.

“She was just the most delightful person you could possibly imagine,” he said.

Lebitka, a long-time Leaside resident, ran her own interior design company dedicated to “creating playful, passionate and peaceful spaces for families, couples and individuals.”

According to a death notice, she was also a devoted mother to her three children, imparting in them an appreciation for the arts and sports.

“Her smile, laughter, caring and love will be missed by all,” it said.

Hindle was widely reported to have been Lebitka’s boyfriend. At his Jan. 17 court appearance, a set date appearance was scheduled for late last month. He is also facing five counts of uttering a forged document and six counts of fraud under $5,000.

Stintz speaks out against Ford’s plan for Eglinton LRT

0

Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) chair Karen Stintz recently spoke out in support of moving the eastern, suburban segment of the Eglinton-Scarborough Crosstown back above ground, as in the earlier Transit City plan. With a favourable response coming from left- and right-wing councillors alike, the main obstacle to shifting gears may be Mayor Rob Ford.

Stintz said that as the details of Ford’s plans to bury the suburban stretch of the Crosstown were worked though, she felt it didn’t made sense to move at-grade technology underground, and increase the cost, where it wasn’t necessary to do so.

“If we didn’t pay the premium there would be funds that would be freed up for other projects,” Stintz added. Discussions of a potential compromise between councillors has involved putting those savings toward the extension of the Sheppard subway to Victoria Park and toward tranist along Finch Avenue, she said.

Coun. John Parker, who had already publicly questioned the logic of burying the portion of the Crosstown east of Laird, said he agreed with Stintz’s position.

“I’m hoping that, before too much time, effort and taxpayer money is invested in this approach, that it is rethought and a more rational approach is pursued,” he said.

Coun. Joe Mihevc commended the TTC chair for her leadership in staking out a position that puts her at odds with the mayor.

“The wider transit community — and this would include the planners, the architects, the engineers — is in support of what the chair has said,” Mihevc said.

A spokesperson from Metrolinx said only that the provincial agency had already stated its position on the matter. David Salter, a press secretary for Bob Chiarelli, the province’s minister of transportation, said he couldn’t speculate on changes to the Crosstown project.

“We need to have clarity from the city, and we want the City of Toronto to land on a single position,” Salter explained.

Mayor Rob Ford’s office did not respond to a request for an interview.

The final conflict: when boyfriend meets trainer

0

There are two very important men in my life: Jordan, my boyfriend, and my personal trainer.

Sometimes I see my personal trainer more during the week. My trainer and I have built up a relationship that mostly consists of some banter followed by him barking out commands such as “Do 15 more lunges.” And I’ll say, “No, I’ll do 12 more lunges.” Then I do 15. He tells me about his somewhat pathetic love life, and I’ll give him advice on women. I consider him a friend.

But now Jordan wants to meet him, and I kind of left out the fact that he is not only a dude, but a superhot dude.

I didn’t want it to cause any unwarranted jealousy or stress, and since my trainer’s name was Laine it was easy enough to avoid. (Sorry, Laine, but it is kind of a female name.) Plus, going to the gym is my time.

Jordan gets all the movies, dinner, travelling and, ahem, the good stuff. Did I really want these two worlds to collide?

I had already introduced the boyfriend to yoga, and we’ve done many classes together. I love the fact that he kind of sucks at yoga, and I love pretending that I don’t notice that he sucks.

I have a great time during these classes because we can fool around together, which makes the 90-minute classes go quicker. Plus, I also love seeing my boyfriend in his workout clothes. It’s the modern version of a uniform. I find it completely sexy.

Now that Jordan and I are close, I do want to spend as much time as possible with him. So I took him with me for a training session with Laine at Track Fitness, where I work out. But, unlike yoga, where there are dozens of people in the class, this workout made me feel like a third wheel.

There is just something about men, when they get together, that I really don’t like being around, and it turns out this is true when it comes to sharing a trainer. When I introduced him, Jordan was shocked that Laine was male, but then they immediately started talking about sports. What’s with that?

I saw another side to him while working out with Laine. First, he complained that he was stiff from playing soccer. My trainer doesn’t let me get away with any excuses, but does Jordan get similar treatment? Hell no. Even if I play the pregnancy card, Laine won’t let me off easy. But, oh, a little stiffness from soccer, poor fella.

The second thing I noticed was that men do not like to be seen as wimps. As I was lifting eight- to 10-pound weights, my trainer made my boyfriend lift 25-pound weights.

My boyfriend was shaking as he lifted, and I said something like, “That looks like it really hurts. I’m serious. You look like you’re in pain.” But he just ignored me and kept lifting.

That might have been cute if I thought he was trying to impress me, but I know he was trying to impress my trainer.

Please. I mean, I’m the one he should be trying to impress. Maybe he should ask Laine out!

Usually, my trainer hands me weights before I lift them. But with Jordan and him chatting about soccer and squash and sex (the fact that my trainer might “get some” that night), I just stood there until finally I said, “Dude! So what? I’m picking up my own weights now?”

The height of absurdity was when my, yes MY!, trainer asked my boyfriend if I was “mean at home.” Then he said, “Because she’s mean to me here!” Chuckles all around at my expense!

And they just love to talk about injuries. It’s like they can’t help themselves. My boyfriend went on about a ski accident he had had that injured his shoulder. But it was 25 years ago! I never thought I’d be jealous over a rotator cuff injury.

It was all bad. There were positives to working out with my boyfriend. My trainer spent so much time with him that when he said, “Rebecca, do 15 chest presses” or “Do 20 squats,” he didn’t notice that I only did half that amount. And, I did enjoy watching my boyfriend work up a sweat. He blew me kisses while I was on the treadmill (my boyfriend, not my trainer), which was sweet. My trainer also trains two other couples and he says he enjoys it.

He sees that couples either motivate each other, mostly by yelling at one another, or that they really love each other because they like spending time together, even if it is at the gym.

When we got home, my boyfriend kept saying how fun that was. “That was so fun,” he repeated over and over. “We should definitely do that once a week together.” Really?

Even though I felt like a third wheel, I wasn’t completely against the idea. I’ll just have to jock up and start telling stories about my old surfing injuries.

Post City Magazines’ columnist Rebecca Eckler is the author of Knocked Up, Wiped!, and her latest books, How to Raise a Boyfriend and The Lucky Sperm Club.

Resident rejects $1 million offer for 18 sewage blockages

0

A North York resident has turned down a $1 million offer from the city for her house after a plumbing problem caused 18 basement floods and half a million dollars worth of damages, according to the home’s owner, Shondra Nauth. The floods, which started back in 2002, were caused by piping problems on Nauth’s street, in the Wilson Heights area.

“My house is worth about $1.3 million,” Nauth said. “I had about 18 basement spills, and each cost me between $7,000 and $10,000. The mayor is offering me $1 million for my home, but why am I selling my house? I don’t want to move.”

An investigation from Toronto’s ombudsman, Fiona Crean, found that the way the city handled the problem was unfair.

“I have supported this complaint and find that the actions and omissions of Toronto’s water and technical services divisions to be unreasonable and unjust,” Crean’s report stated. Nauth said she wants the city to pay for the damages and repair her house, which she estimates will cost about $500,000.

Mayor Rob Ford’s office did not respond to requests for comments.

Richmond Hill renovator found guilty in Davis trial

0

A home renovator, based in Richmond Hill, was recently sentenced to life in prison after a jury found him guilty of murdering philanthropist Glen Davis.

Ivgeny Vorobiov was convicted of first-degree murder, whereas a hung jury resulted in a mistrial for Dmitri Kossyrine, the second accused in the plot to kill Davis. The accused returns to court this month to settle the matter.

The case dates back to 2007, when Davis was gunned down, after lunch at the Granite Brewery, in a parking garage, near Eglinton Avenue and Mt. Pleasant Road in Toronto. The jury heard that Vorobiov and Kossyrine were allegedly hired by Davis’s cousin and godson, Marshall Ross, to kill the philanthropist.

“I am advised that my client has filed an appeal,” counsel for Vorobiov, Liam O’Connor, wrote in an e-mail.

Vorobiov is facing life imprisonment without the possibility of parole for 25 years, explained Brendan Crawley, senior co-ordinator of media relations for the Crown attorney’s office.

“As always, our thoughts are with the victim’s family and all those who were affected by this event,” Crawley added in a statement.

Both O’Connor and Crawley said that they could not comment further, as the case is still before the courts.

Kossyrine is due back in court on Feb. 15.

Parker ready for prime time

0

Molly Parker has one of those names — people have heard it, but they “can't place the face,” as they say. Maybe because she’s been that indie queen starring in low-budget films from up-and-comers you’ve always wanted to check out, but there’s never a copy of their video at the local video store. She plays the roles that allow her to flex her considerable acting talents, but not in Hollywood films and definitely not, gasp, in television.

That was then, and a lot has changed. Movie work is dwindling, and the idiot box is the new indie film thanks to a major push for channels to offer up brave, progressive and well-written shows. And so we find Parker in her most mainstream role to date, as Abby McDeere, wife of Mitch McDeere, in the TV adaptation of John Grisham’s The Firm, now playing on NBC and Global. And suddenly people are rediscovering this talented Canadian actress.

Although The Firm is a whiz-bang mid-season show for NBC in the United States, it is a decidedly Canadian affair. Alongside American stars Josh Lucas and Juliette Lewis stand Parker and local boy Callum Keith Rennie as well as a slew of regular Canadian guest stars such as Shaun Majumder and Tricia Helfer. But it is the four stars that make the show work. The on-screen chemistry is obvious, and it’s what drew Parker to the role.

“I came to it a bit late,” says Parker, on set after a day of shooting in the furthest reaches of northwestern Toronto. “I had been doing another pilot for another show and was waiting to see if that would get picked up, and after many, many months, when that didn’t happen, these guys were still interested and I took the job. Callum, who is an old friend of mine, who I’ve know for 20 years, was already involved, and Josh and Juliette had been cast, so a lot of my interest in it had to do with the cast. And I thought, between the four of us, we could do something fun and interesting. And I was also interested in being a part of something that was entertaining that people would see.”

The plot picks up on the life of Mitch (Tom Cruise’s character from the 1993 movie version) following a decade-long stint in the witness protection program. He’s in Washington, D.C., operating his own law firm with his ex-con brother (Rennie) and his brother’s wife (Lewis), working as an investigator and secretary, respectively. Abby is a school teacher, and she and Mitch have a teenaged daughter.


Juliette Lewis and Josh Lucas star in The Firm

“They’ve been together forever and have a child together, who was born when they were in witness protection, so this is just the beginning of trying to have a new life,” explains Parker. “One of the things interesting to me coming into this was what happens to people who are in hiding, essentially, for 10 years. These people couldn’t use their names, they were moving from city to city. They were raising a little girl, but essentially they were an island and it’s sort of us versus them.”

It is an interesting and meaty prospect for an actor naturally used to being in the public eye to delve into a character that has spent a decade in hiding.

“I always like to play people who have secrets, you know?” she says. “I mean, even if I’m not playing a character with a secret, I often try to have a secret anyway. It’s interesting to watch somebody who is not all there on the surface.”

The show operates with three story lines. One, the people McDeere put in prison 10 years ago, the ones that sent him into hiding, have found him. So the threat of imminent retribution is there. In addition, there is an ongoing plot involving a murder investigation and the law firm that McDeere begins to work with in the premiere episode. And, each episode has its own self-contained court drama. That’s a lot of material to pack into an hour. As a result, the show moves along at a brisk and entertaining pace.

It has been described as old-fashioned and nostalgic — in both a good way and a bad way — and a lot of that, according to Parker, stems from the absence of other-worldly plot devices used in many current shows.

“I do think we live in a time when most of the shows are high concept,” says Parker, of the slew of crime-style shows featuring characters with enhanced, psychic or paranormal abilities such as The Listener or The Mentalist. “We have a lot of shows about, like, detectives who have [special] senses … really just out there.”

“Out there” is a place Molly Parker knows well when it comes to her acting roles. In her first film she played a necrophiliac. Kissed opened at the Toronto International Film Festival in 1996, earning the film a special jury citation and Parker some much-needed buzz. And although all of her roles aren’t at quite the necrophiliac level, she has certainly been fearless in her choices, gravitating toward characters first and film second.

“Almost all along I have looked for interesting characters, you know, so I’ve done many movies that no one has ever seen because it was a great character that I wanted to play, knowing that it wouldn’t get distribution or that it was someone’s first film. I mean I did a lot of those,” says Parker with emphasis on “a lot.”

Parker, who is living in the Roncesvalles neighbourhood of Toronto while shooting for The Firm, grew up on a farm near Pitt Meadows, B.C., the child of back-to-the-land hippies who eventually moved to town when the family opened up a seafood shop.

Her childhood as a fishmonger’s daughter, travelling to the docks in Vancouver many an early morning to seek out product to supply the store, has made it impossible for her to eat seafood in Toronto. But with a five-year-old son at home, Parker says, it is “all about the grilled cheese” and heading to the playground.

That opportunity to have a somewhat regular life of grilled cheese and playgrounds with the family is another major draw to TV work, says Parker, who splits time between Toronto and her home in Los Angeles.

“I am a mom, and it’s good, you know?” she explains. “If it works … it works well.”

Major makeover in the works for Centre Street

0

Local councillors have drafted a plan for major redevelopment and mass transit lanes along Centre Street in Thornhill, much to the dismay of neighbouring residents. If the plan is adopted by Vaughan city council, the land between Dufferin Street and New Westminster Drive would be rezoned to allow for high-density development, as opposed to the current two-storey maximum.

“The street was becoming a wasteland,” said local Coun. Alan Shefman, who added that the new Viva rapid transitway and much-anticipated Yonge Street subway extension were also motivating factors in developing the street. The draft plan includes a 12-storey building and a two-storey townhouse complex on the corner of New Westminster Drive and Centre Street. In addition, the plan calls for the redevelopment of retail, underground parking lots and a park. The challenge, Shefman added, is giving developers enough density to warrant underground parking, which tends to be expensive.

“The fact is that Centre Street will be a rapid transit corridor, and it’s owned by a wide variety of property owners, and what tends to happen in those cases is a hodgepodge of development,” Shefman said. “You end up with no vision and no sense of community.”

But Gila Martow, president of the Beverly Glen Ratepayers Association, said that is not the right type of development for the area.

“There is no flow along Centre Street, so obviously something has to be done,” Martow said. “I’m annoyed that the suggestion … is vacant lots or high density. We’ve had our fair share. By fixing one problem, they’re creating hundreds more. This isn’t why I wanted to live in Thornhill.”

Martow added that she would like to see an Art Deco type of development, with street-level shopping and patios. She added that she gathered at least 100 signatures from residents opposed to the plan.

City staff is currently finalizing the plan, slated for council at the end of February or early March.

Shulman named national sportscaster of the year

0

Thornhiller Dan Shulman, a veteran sports journalist with ESPN and formerly of TSN, was recently named the National Sports Broadcaster of the Year by a distinguished association of his peers.

“I’ve considered myself an under-the-radar guy and don’t think about myself in those terms, so I was extremely surprised and extremely honoured,” Shulman said.

Shulman was chosen by the National Sportscasters and Sportswriters Association (NSSA), based in North Carolina. The award honours excellence in sports journalism and broadcasting. Shulman said that being honoured by his peers made the bestowment that much more meaningful. Last year, Shulman became ESPN’s Sunday night play-by-play commentator for Major League Baseball, which he said was the defining moment in his career. He is also the first two-time Sports Media Canada Broadcaster of the Year.

“Within the last year, I took over the play-by-play for Sunday night baseball, which was a significant step for me. I do college basketball. I do the NBA and hope to do that for a long time,” he added.

The NSSA will present Shulman with the award on June 11.

Council approves 197 units adjacent to park

0

North York councillors have agreed in principle to an application for a development, at 55 Antibes Dr. (north of Bathurst St. and Finch Ave.), that would introduce almost 200 townhouses on parklands, despite concerns from local residents who were told the development could have been much worse. Submitted by Menkes Developments Ltd., the application was for a zoning bylaw amendment to permit 197 condominium townhouse units, which was approved on Jan. 10 at North York Community Council.

“Like the residents, I have concerns about what would be going on this site,” said Coun. James Pasternak. “The community was put on notice that if the idea doesn’t pass either the current developer or a new one could come back with a 25-storey high-rise, and that could be worse.”

The land, previously owned by the Toronto District School Board and zoned for educational purposes, lies adjacent to Antibes Park, and sparked an outcry from residents.

“Those grounds are well used by residents and their children,” said Margot Levitt, president of the Ridgegate Ratepayers Association. Levitt added that increased traffic will make it difficult to get on to Bathurst Street, already a bottleneck, during rush hours and said she is concerned that basement flooding will increase due to an aging sewage pipe infrastructure.

Pasternak agreed, but said that, when it comes to development in the city, it is important to work with developers, as appeals to the Ontario Municipal Board can relinquish community control.

“We have to be very careful, that, when it comes to applications, we don’t end up with something worse than we were fighting,” he said.

“It’s low-rise density in an apartment neighbourhood,” countered Adam Brown, counsel for Menkes. “It’s not even close to implementing the official plan in terms of height, it’s 20 storeys lower than other buildings surrounding us. I would be shocked if it doesn’t go through.”

The application is slated for Toronto City Council on Feb. 6.

Canada’s Warren Buffett buys retail landmarks

0

Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited, headed up by Rosedale’s Prem Watsa, recently acquired a controlling stake in Sporting Life. Watsa will support plans by the original owners — and holders of the remaining stake — to expand their brand across the country.

“Today’s acquisition is consistent with our ongoing interest in acquiring strong, established franchises from entrepreneurial founders who want to find a long-term home for their business,” Watsa said.

Last year, Fairfax snapped up Prime Restaurants (East Side Mario’s and others) and the Yorkville-based William Ashley China. Watsa also was recently added to the struggling Research in Motion’s board of directors.

Sporting Life president, David Russell, said he and his partners were looking at ways to grow the high-end sporting goods business while still remaining involved in the company.

The deal will see Russell and his partners continue to oversee the day-to-day operations.

“The Fairfax people — they’re long-term holders. What we like about that is we can grow at a pace that’s appropriate,” Russell said.